Benchmark - UnixBench 5.1.2

**cresci** · 22-12-2011, 22:51

Resultados para Amazon m2.xlarge, storage local, 64bit:

================================================== ======================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: ip-10-252-7-155: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5.centos.plusxen -- #1 SMP Mon Jul 18 11:02:46 EDT 2011
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz (6668.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz (6668.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
17:51:17 up 2 min, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.11, 0.04; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 22 2011 17:51:17 - 18:15:25
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15464957.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3043.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1872.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 441649.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 115503.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4158.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3994.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 415.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 798.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 530225.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15464957.9 1325.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3043.0 553.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 1872.1 435.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 441649.7 355.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 115503.3 288.8
Process Creation 126.0 4158.8 330.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3994.7 942.1
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 415.3 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 798.8 1331.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 530225.4 353.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 552.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 22 2011 18:15:25 - 18:39:35
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30843696.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6084.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3350.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 882772.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 228575.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7527.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5990.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 442.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 876.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 900555.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30843696.1 2643.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6084.4 1106.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 3350.0 779.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 882772.3 709.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 228575.4 571.4
Process Creation 126.0 7527.5 597.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5990.3 1412.8
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 442.7 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 876.5 1460.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 900555.1 600.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 958.6

cPanel install finished in 72 minutes and 56 seconds!

**chuvadenovembro** · 15-03-2012, 14:29

Postado originalmente por Winger

se quando voce executar o "make" der o erro:

Código PHP:


make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1

execute:

Código PHP:


yum install -y SDL-devel mesa-libGL-devel

e depois:

make all

Smart da iweb acho que não pode ser testado p/ não correr o risco de desanimar o cliente hehehe

Tentei fazer este procedimento p/ corrigir o erro que da aqui quando executo o comando make

Mas recebo outro erro depois que baixa os arquivos:

Transaction Check Error:
package mesa-libGL-6.5.1-7.10.el5.x86_64 (which is newer than mesa-libGL-6.5.1-7.8.el5.i386) is already installed
package esound-0.2.36-4.x86_64 (which is newer than esound-0.2.36-3.i386) is already installed
package mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.10.el5.x86_64 (which is newer than mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.8.el5.i386) is already installed

**Winger** · 22-03-2012, 21:11

Seguem os testes da ultima oferta da turnkey:

================================================== ======================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: srv.host.com.br: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz (5634.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz (5634.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz (5634.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz (5698.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
18:10:31 up 51 min, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.08, 0.03; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Mar 22 2012 18:10:31 - 18:34:36
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15618199.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3242.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3052.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1058585.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 176580.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10424.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6077.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1433.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2643.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 877311.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15618199.6 1338.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3242.0 589.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3052.7 709.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1058585.3 851.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 176580.9 441.5
Process Creation 126.0 10424.3 827.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6077.4 1433.4
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1433.4 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2643.5 4405.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 877311.5 584.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 952.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Mar 22 2012 18:34:36 - 18:58:42
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 62050653.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12937.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 14855.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4213931.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1342960.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 46849.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21868.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1693.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3358.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2678325.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 62050653.6 5317.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12937.9 2352.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 14855.1 3454.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4213931.0 3387.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1342960.3 3357.4
Process Creation 126.0 46849.2 3718.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21868.3 5157.6
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1693.1 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3358.1 5596.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2678325.0 1785.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 3569.9

velocidade de disco:

[root@srv /]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.1273 seconds, 76.0 MB/s

download:

[root@srv /]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2012-03-22 18:05:11-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `/dev/null'

100%[================================================== ============================>] 104,857,600 1.12M/s in 89s

2012-03-22 18:06:40 (1.12 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

HD´s:

ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x2438 ctl 0x2454 bmdma 0x2410 irq 50
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x2430 ctl 0x2450 bmdma 0x2418 irq 50
ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata1.00: ATA-7: ST3250410AS, 4.AAA, max UDMA/133
ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata2.00: ATA-7: ST3250310AS, 4.AAA, max UDMA/133
ata2.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
Vendor: ATA Model: ST3250410AS Rev: 4.AA
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05

**5ms** · 22-03-2012, 21:39

O meu chute de 70MB/s para o DD bateu na trave.

**Winger** · 22-03-2012, 22:02

Postado originalmente por 5ms

O meu chute de 70MB/s para o DD bateu na trave.

hehehe, acho ate que foi gol!!

**chuvadenovembro** · 30-03-2012, 18:56

Pessoal,

Peguei um servidor pelo Kemeda - a sua gama de servidores dedicados a partir de 14.99 Euros / m

Deveria ter sido um celeron ou atom, mas verifiquei que é um "Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.00GHz" com dois nucleos 64 bits com hd de 1Tb.

Resultados:

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 6739233.7 577.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1525.6 277.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 1971.0 458.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 898464.1 722.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 97984.1 245.0
Process Creation 126.0 5833.6 463.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2534.0 597.6
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 178.8 ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 357.6 595.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1366399.0 910.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 499.9

Teste de hd:

1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB) copied, 12,9744 seconds, 82,8 MB/s

Download:

100%[======================================>] 104.857.600 11,2M/s em 8,9s

2012-03-30 22:55:14 (11,2 MB/s) - '/dev/null' gravado [104857600/104857600]

**tekobr** · 30-03-2012, 21:06

chuva, foi aquele de 14,99 euros? qual o resultado do ping e tracert para ele?

**chuvadenovembro** · 31-03-2012, 13:05

Postado originalmente por tekobr

chuva, foi aquele de 14,99 euros? qual o resultado do ping e tracert para ele?

É aquele mesmo

O ping aqui p/ mim ta aceitavel, acho que daria p/ colocar em produção fácil.

Pinging 213.251.187.124 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=49
Reply from 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48
Reply from 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 213.251.187.124:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 263ms, Maximum = 273ms, Average = 268ms

**5ms** · 31-03-2012, 13:19

É latência que não acaba mais e ainda duas travessias de oceano. Não tem como ter boa performance.

**tekobr** · 31-03-2012, 21:57

Postado originalmente por chuvadenovembro

É aquele mesmo

O ping aqui p/ mim ta aceitavel, acho que daria p/ colocar em produção fácil.

Realmente pode ser colocado sim em produção. Veja testes daqui com Oi Velox:

Código:

ping 213.251.187.124 -n 10

Disparando 213.251.187.124 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=228ms TTL=53
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=221ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=226ms TTL=53
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=232ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=238ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=231ms TTL=53
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=241ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=221ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=219ms TTL=52
Resposta de 213.251.187.124: bytes=32 tempo=226ms TTL=52

Estatísticas do Ping para 213.251.187.124:
    Pacotes: Enviados = 10, Recebidos = 10, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
             perda),
Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
    Mínimo = 219ms, Máximo = 241ms, Média = 228ms

A mão aqui está coçando para contratar um desses.

Tópico: Benchmark - UnixBench 5.1.2

LinkBack

Ferramentas de Tópicos

Pesquisar Tópico

Exibir

Quad Core Q9550 da Turnkey ($49,00)

Tags para este Tópico

Permissões de Postagem

Serviços de Internet

Desenvolvimento Web

Marketing Digital

Consumidor Tech