The online retailer and cloud giant has hired several chip engineers who used to work at Calxeda, the former ARM-based server startup out of Austin, Texas that shut down last year, including the former Calxeda CTO. It also has a few job listings for its Silicon Optimization team based in Austin, Texas that call for microprocessor design expertise, including one for a “CPU Architect / Micro-Architect.”
Amazon declined to comment on its plans; actually, a spokeswoman said, “We don’t comment on rumors or speculation.” Don’t worry, we’ll make sure to ask Amazon’s CTO Werner Vogels (pictured) about these plans at our Structure event in June. However, several sources in the Austin chip community have been discussing the impact of Amazon’s decision to swoop in and recruit engineers after Calxeda shut down in December, curious about whether or not Amazon planned to follow other webscale businesses Google and Facebook in trying to build their own silicon.
A risky bet and unorthodox thinking
Now, a few sources who aren’t authorized to speak publicly about Amazon’s plans say Amazon is indeed going that route. Judging by a search of LinkedIn profiles, Amazon has hired at least six former Calxeda employees with both silicon design, fabric and board design experience. The new Amazon hires came in on in March with job titles that include, Principal Engineer, Silicon Optimization at Amazon Web Services; Hardware Development Engineer; Hardware Design Engineer; Director of Silicon Optimizations at Amazon Web Services; and Manager of Hardware Engineering, Silicon Optimizations at Amazon Web Services.
When pointed to the job listing and Calxeda hires, Patrick Moorhead, president and principal analyst at Moor Insights and Strategy, said that it looks like Amazon is investigating custom chips as opposed to just working with existing chip suppliers to get more highly optimized silicon and boards.
“That listing looks like they are taking an ARM architecture license to roll their own core,” he said. “Why else would you need an architect?”
But taking on silicon design is a big bet, even though it has become more feasible as operating systems and supporting software built around alternative silicon architectures become more visible.
“It is a major investment in the hundreds of millions of dollars to build your own custom core but if you buy hardware like Amazon does, and if you are truly successful at matching your workloads to your processors, then it could pay off,” Moorhead said. “But it’s very risky.”
He added that he doesn’t know if any of those trying to design their own cores are going to be able to compete with Intel on pure performance, but noted that if Amazon were looking at using lower-performance cores in a massively distributed fashion (which would also be a reason to hire the Calxeda engineers who are expert at building out distributed compute fabrics) that could create cost optimizations that could justify the expense of “rolling its own core.”
In the commodity cloud even chips can be squeezed
Despite the challenges, Amazon’s foray into silicon makes sense. As we’ve written before, the costs of designing your own silicon have dropped while the penalties for not cutting as much cost as possible from your hardware operations have risen.
Last November Amazon’s James Hamilton explained the company’s thinking about building its own servers and infrastructure, pointing out that it saved 30 percent on costs.
Like Google and Facebook, Amazon is designing its own servers, and they’re all specialized for the particular service they’re running. Back in the day, Hamilton used to lobby for just having one or two SKUs from a server vendor in order to minimize complexity, but times have changed. Once you master the process, going straight to server manufacturers with custom designs can lop 30 percent off the price right away, not to mention the improved performance and faster turnaround time.
Today, “You’d be stealing from your customers not to optimize your hardware,” he said.
And now with Google and Facebook investigating chip designs optimized for their workloads, Amazon can only do what it can to keep pace with its rivals; especially Google, who will likely be Amazon’s biggest competitor when it comes to offering a commodity cloud platform. If you take IBM’s decision to use its open Power8 architecture in its SoftLayer cloud (Google is also evaluating that architecture), it too, is using custom silicon for its cloud offering. That of course, leaves Microsoft’s plans an open question.
The looming introduction of a 64-bit ARM-based server core (production 64-bit ARM server chips are expected from a variety of vendors later this year) also changes the economics of developing a server chip. While Moorhead believes building your own core is a multihundred million dollar process, Andrew Feldman, the corporate vice president and general manager of Advanced Micro Devices’ server chip business, told me last December that it could be in the tens of millions.
Feldman also said, that for the webscale players, it’s not a question of if they will develop their own chips, but of when. At the time he said he suspects we’ll see custom chips coming out in the next three to five years. However, to make that possibility a firm would have to start designing today.
That’s appears to be exactly what Amazon is doing.