Resultados 1 a 10 de 10
  1. #1
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043

    NetDepot Cloud is Live – Promo for Existing Client Enclosed

    We are pleased to announce the launch of our new NetDepot.com Cloud.

    Please take a look at our cloud offering at: https://www.netdepot.com/cloud-servers/

    We are offering a special promotion to our EXISTING customers – signup for a cloud account today, deposit $5 and we will add an addition $25 – that is a 5x return on your money immediately!

    Our Cloud infrastructure is built on 100% SSD drives to give you our customer the fastest possible experience. Spin up a development test server today or build your entire infrastructure on the cloud.

    All of our cloud services have full private networking access to your existing dedicated servers for full flexibility connecting all of our facilities.

    To take advantage of this bonus deposit, please e-mail me directly after your signup at rgiles@netdepot.com and we will process the additional credit.

    Sincerely,

    Rodney Giles, President
    NetDepot.com

  2. #2
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043



    Atlanta

    • PCCWBTN
    • nLayer
    • Cogent
    • XO




    Dallas

    • Abovenet
    • nLayer



    NetDepot operates AS3595, AS16626 & AS27413 within our US facilities. Our redundant core network design with a multi-homed carrier approach provides for the most redundant network design available for critical cloud infrastructure. We utilize some of the best carriers on our bandwidth blend which include Zayo, GTT, PCCW, Cogent and many others.

  3. #3
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043
    Vamos lá ...

    Como sou cliente, solicitei o bonus -- foi depositado 2h após.

    As informações no site são escassas e algumas discordantes. Por exemplo, em algumas telas você tem VM de US$5 (0,007) com 30GB SSD SAN e 2TB@20GE, em outras, 20GB SSD, 1TB@?

    Acabei por criar uma VM para verificar o que está valendo:

    Disk Space 20 GB
    Memory 512 MB (Swap 1GB)
    CPU Cores 2 CPUs
    CPU Priority 20 %

    KVM
    Templates
    Apenas Atlanta

    root@FL35:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.27404 s, 472 MB/s

    root@FL35:~# lscpu
    Architecture: x86_64
    CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
    Byte Order: Little Endian
    CPU(s): 2
    On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
    Thread(s) per core: 1
    Core(s) per socket: 1
    Socket(s): 2
    NUMA node(s): 1
    Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
    CPU family: 6
    Model: 13
    Stepping: 3
    CPU MHz: 2299.996
    BogoMIPS: 4599.99
    Hypervisor vendor: KVM
    Virtualization type: full
    L1d cache: 32K
    L1i cache: 32K
    L2 cache: 4096K
    NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1

    root@FL35:~# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    ute cachefly.cachefly.net--2015-02-03 17:14:52-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'

    100%[======================>] 104,857,600 70.0M/s in 1.4s

    2015-02-03 17:14:54 (70.0 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

    root@FL35:~# traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net
    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    2 atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net (209.51.149.105) 0.592 ms 0.698 ms 0.818 ms
    3 atl-core-g-g1-6.gnax.net (63.247.69.178) 0.449 ms 0.451 ms 0.540 ms
    4 * * *
    5 67.111.23.92.ptr.us.xo.net (67.111.23.92) 0.503 ms 0.504 ms 0.508 ms
    6 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 0.427 ms 0.511 ms 0.493 ms

  4. #4
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043
    OnApp

  5. #5
    Moderador
    Data de Ingresso
    Oct 2010
    Localização
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,679
    Vamos ver se melhora, agora que a empresa mudou de mãos...

  6. #6
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043
    Piscataway (NJ) -> Atlanta


  7. #7
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043

    $5 vm

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

    Código:
      OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.2.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 3.2.65-1+deb7u1
       Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4600.0 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4600.0 bogomips)
              x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
       17:18:58 up 20:00,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.02; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 04 2015 17:18:58 - 17:39:48
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       36559593.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     4235.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               3822.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2658123.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 461531.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               8816.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9882.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1994.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        4210662.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   36559593.3   3132.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4235.6    770.1
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3822.2    888.9
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2658123.8   2136.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     461531.6   1153.8
    Process Creation                                126.0       8816.5    699.7
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9882.7   2330.8
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1994.3   3323.8
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4210662.5   2807.1
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                         1628.3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 04 2015 17:39:48 - 18:00:38
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       72016421.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     8439.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               8382.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             5272159.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 809502.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              22290.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  14977.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2080.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        4934940.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   72016421.8   6171.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8439.0   1534.4
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       8382.5   1949.4
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5272159.6   4238.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     809502.7   2023.8
    Process Creation                                126.0      22290.9   1769.1
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      14977.4   3532.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2080.6   3467.7
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4934940.0   3290.0
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                         2820.2

  8. #8
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043
    Encrenca ...

    1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
    2 * * * Request timed out.
    3 36 ms 46 ms 32 ms 201-0-92-173.dsl.telesp.net.br [201.0.92.173]
    4 33 ms 34 ms 33 ms 200-100-3-225.dsl.telesp.net.br [200.100.3.225]
    5 34 ms * 31 ms 187-100-34-165.dsl.telesp.net.br [187.100.34.165]
    6 48 ms * 48 ms 213.140.51.17
    7 153 ms 152 ms 152 ms Xe9-1-6-0-grtmiabr4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net [176.52.255.62]
    8 183 ms 189 ms 182 ms Xe2-1-1-0-grtdaleq4.red.telefonica-wholesale.net [176.52.251.53]
    9 185 ms 181 ms 184 ms xe-10-1-2.edge5.Dallas3.Level3.net [4.59.36.25]
    10 * * * Request timed out.
    11 219 ms 208 ms 213 ms GIGLINX-INC.ear1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.35.6.114]
    12 209 ms 210 ms 217 ms ATL-CORE-INT-GA.gnax.net [209.51.137.218]

  9. #9
    Moderador
    Data de Ingresso
    Oct 2010
    Localização
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    2,679
    convenhamos que a encrenca é da Telefonica pra variar

  10. #10
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,043
    Pois é

    Continua valendo aquela discussão antiga que Dallas ou NYC é "melhor" do que Atlanta ou Miami.

    BTW NYC-Atlanta ~20ms Dallas-Atlanta ~20ms

Permissões de Postagem

  • Você não pode iniciar novos tópicos
  • Você não pode enviar respostas
  • Você não pode enviar anexos
  • Você não pode editar suas mensagens
  •