Resultados 1 a 1 de 1
  1. #1
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    15,051

    [EN] Obama e o golpe do Cadillac

    March 17 2015, 9:00 AM

    It seems that others are finally under the realization of what I have been saying since the ACA became law. The “Cadillac” tax on health insurance may jokingly become the “Chevy” tax.

    The 40% excise levy starts in 2018 on high-cost insurance coverage: those above $10,200 a year in premiums for an individual; $27,500 for families. I have clients with basic coverage which are near those levels already. When more plans switch to an age based formula this will make it easier to pass these thresholds.

    The coverage ceiling for medical expenses are indexed to overall inflation, not to medical costs, which rise significantly faster, 2.4% in 2014, compared with 0.8% for overall inflation. Those stats are national averages, not Chicago area based which I am sure are higher.

    So over time more moderately priced plans will bump up against the limit, very quickly. Then the penalties will fly.

    Current estimates have 14% of firms will pay the tax in 2018 that will be charged. But the estimates have more than two-thirds of businesses being on the hook to pay by 2023. So that will be a nice shock to shareholders and small business owners, not to mention the employees.

    Posted by: Leif Jensen
    http://www.leifjensenassoc.com/index...e/blog/finally


    Cadillac insurance plan
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Informally, a Cadillac plan is any unusually expensive health insurance plan, usually arising in discussions of medical-cost control measures in the United States.The term derives from the Cadillac automobile, which has represented American luxury since its introduction in 1902, and as a health care metaphor dates to the 1970s. The term gained popularity in the early 1990s during the debate over the Clinton health care plan of 1993, and was also widespread during debate over possible excise taxes on "Cadillac" plans during the health care reforms proposed during the Obama administration. (Bills proposed by Clinton and Obama did not use the term "Cadillac".)
    As most Cadillac plans are sponsored by employers, economists generally believe that the widespread availability of these plans is at least partially attributable to the tax-advantaged status that employer-sponsored health plans currently have. Employer-sponsored health insurance is considered part of the employees' compensation package, but is not taxed as wages. This is essentially a government subsidy that encourages employers to offer, and employees to enroll in, more expensive plans that cover more of the cost of medical care, and then the employees use that subsidized medical care excessively because they are insulated from its full cost, according to some commenters.
    A study published in Health Affairs in December 2009 found that high-cost health plans do not provide unusually rich benefits to enrollees. The researchers found that only 3.7% of the variation in the cost of family coverage in employer-sponsored health plans is attributable to differences in the actuarial value of benefits. Only 6.1% of the variation is attributable to the combination of benefit design and plan type (e.g., PPO, HMO, etc.). The employer's industry and regional variations in health care costs explain part of the variation, but most is unexplained. The researchers conclude "…that analysts should not equate high-cost plans with Cadillac plans, but that in fact other factors—industry and cost of medical inputs—are as important in predicting whether a plan is a high-cost plan. Without appropriate adjustments, a simple cap may exacerbate rather than ameliorate current inequities."
    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010), imposes an annual 40% excise tax on plans with annual premiums exceeding $10,200 for individuals or $27,500 for a family starting in 2018, to be paid by insurers. The tax is not imposed on the total cost of the plan, but on the costs exceeding the aforementioned values, which, after 2018, will adjust to inflation annually. These costs include any part of a person's income allocated to flexible spending accounts, health reimbursement accounts, and health savings accounts, but not expenditures for stand-alone dental, vision, accident, disability, or long-term care insurance coverage.The tax is intended to do three things: help finance the PPACA; reduce overall health care costs; and address the unequal tax benefit of excluding employer-based health insurance coverage from taxes.
    Última edição por 5ms; 17-03-2015 às 14:40.

Permissões de Postagem

  • Você não pode iniciar novos tópicos
  • Você não pode enviar respostas
  • Você não pode enviar anexos
  • Você não pode editar suas mensagens
  •