Resultados 1 a 2 de 2
  1. #1
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010

    [EN] Dell-EMC to be top vendor in 2017 enterprise on-premises spend

    25 Jan 2016 at 20:17, Chris Mellor

    In its inaugural Voice of the Enterprise: Storage Study, 451 Research forecasts public cloud storage spend to double in two years – with NetApp, HPE and IBM falling down the supplier rankings as Amazon's AWS and Microsoft's Azure bulldoze their way in.

    We have seen a copy of the report: 451 asked its enterprise research base “which vendor does your organization currently spend the most with on storage in 2015 and which will it spend the most on in 2017?"

    The top five suppliers in 2015 were EMC (29%), NetApp (13%), Dell (13%), Hewlett Packard Enterprise (10%) and IBM (10%). 451 said AWS and Azure muscled their way into the top five in 2017, but what happened to the others?

    Firstly, EMC still leads, but with by a reduced amount (24%) with AWS second at 11%. Dell is still third but at 10%. Microsoft is in fourth place at 9% with HPE dropping to fifth place, also holding 9%.

    NetApp is in sixth place at 8.6%, followed by IBM at 7%. HDS is eighth with 5%. Nimble has risen from, its 2015 2.2% to 2.7% in 2017.

    In joint tenth place is Pure Storage at 1.5%, up from the 0.5% 451 recorded for 2015. VMWare is equal tenth with 1.5%; Oracle is in twelfth place with 0.5%, down from 2015’s 1.6%.

    The chart shows the carnage that is slated to happen:

    Enterprise storage suppliers; winners and losers 2015 to 2017

    It’s apparent that a Dell-EMC combination in 2017 would command 34%. Add in VMware and we have 35.6%, dwarfing every other supplier. If we take a last man standing view for on-premises storage then Dell-EMC is it.

    Oracle’s falling share is a surprise. NetApp’s is not, although the magnitude is. Another non-shocker is IBM’s decline. The research house notes:

    Just 42% of those who cited NetApp as their key storage supplier intend to increase 2016 spending with that vendor, while almost half (48%) plan to cut spending. Notably, almost 30% plan 25 to 60 per cent spending reductions; the highest such decline in the Q4 study. For IBM, just over a third of customers citing IBM as a strategic storage supplier plan to reduce spending on Big Blue’s storage portfolio in 2016.

    The on-premises storage spend shifts away from legacy SAN and filer products, with all-flash arrays being the main beneficiary particularly in smaller organizations. Both hyper-converged infrastructure products and object storage technologies also look set for healthy spending growth in 2016.

    The rush to cloud storage is most evident in retail organizations, which expect 25 per cent of storage spending to be cloud-based by 2017. Smaller businesses (those with fewer than 250 employees) expect 20 per cent of their storage related spending to be cloud-based by 2017.

    The top causes of data capacity growth are: increasing file sizes and user data (46%), server virtualization (42%), RDBMS (40%) and backup and archive (37%), with data warehouse and analytics coming in at 31%.

    451 notes that the top three vendors, usage-wise, for all-flash arrays are EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM, in that order, followed by Pure Storage and NetApp.

    It also notes that the largest planned spending declines in storage are in tape infrastructure, with over 40 per cent of surveyed IT departments planning slight or significant decreases in 2016. This is an area, we're told, where public cloud adoption is clearly taking over from traditional approaches.

  2. #2
    WHT-BR Top Member
    Data de Ingresso
    Dec 2010

    May the force be with you

    Adrian McDonald - President EMC EMEA

    Berlin, 2nd day of #emcphoenix2

Permissões de Postagem

  • Você não pode iniciar novos tópicos
  • Você não pode enviar respostas
  • Você não pode enviar anexos
  • Você não pode editar suas mensagens